AnkerDirect via Amazon has 2-Pack Anker 25W USB-C Super Fast PPS Charger w/ 2x 5' USB-C Cable (Non-Foldable) on sale for $15.99. Shipping is free w/ Prime or $35+ orders.
Thanks to Staff Member DesertGardener for posting this deal.
Features:
2 Pack of 25W USB-C Chargers (non-foldable) + 2 Pack of 5' USB-C cables
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
AnkerDirect via Amazon has 2-Pack Anker 25W USB-C Super Fast PPS Charger w/ 2x 5' USB-C Cable (Non-Foldable) on sale for $15.99. Shipping is free w/ Prime or $35+ orders.
Thanks to Staff Member DesertGardener for posting this deal.
Features:
2 Pack of 25W USB-C Chargers (non-foldable) + 2 Pack of 5' USB-C cables
Model: Anker 25W USB-C Super Fast Charger, Anker Charger (Non-Foldable) with USBC Cable, Supports PPS Fast Charging for Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra/S23+/S23/S22/S21/S20/Note 20, & More 2Pack 5ft Cable Included
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I don't know when Anker released these but they appear to be roughly the same size and power and quality of the Samsung built 25w PD + PPS
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
Lol, it's almost like I'm looking for a conspiracy but honestly I trust Anker I was just more curious how they had a product lineup that I've never seen pop up before and quick research showed me this is definitely a cheap 25 watt double pack with cheap cables, I'm sure they're fine but not the premium Anker ones lol
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
I don't know when Anker released these but they appear to be roughly the same size and power and quality of the Samsung built 25w PD + PPS
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
Last edited by vonDubenshire March 12, 2024 at 07:07 AM.
I don't know when Anker released these but they appear to be roughly the same size and power and quality of the Samsung built 25w PD + PPS
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
Damn. Conspiracy theories. Got any other hot takes?
Damn. Conspiracy theories. Got any other hot takes?
Lol, it's almost like I'm looking for a conspiracy but honestly I trust Anker I was just more curious how they had a product lineup that I've never seen pop up before and quick research showed me this is definitely a cheap 25 watt double pack with cheap cables, I'm sure they're fine but not the premium Anker ones lol
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
I don't know when Anker released these but they appear to be roughly the same size and power and quality of the Samsung built 25w PD + PPS
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
I see a 2 pack of 20W dual port (1 type C, 1 type A) for only $0.15 more after 15% off coupon
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
I see a 2 pack of 20W dual port (1 type C, 1 type A) for only $0.15 more after 15% off coupon
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
How do the two compare? Original deal of this dual port?
How do the two compare? Original deal of this dual port?
What I see is this post has a single port USB C 25W with pps.
The other post only has 20W dual port. So one extra port but 5 less Watts. I didnt see PPS so if that's a deal breaker I'd say skip the dual port unit.
I see a 2 pack of 20W dual port (1 type C, 1 type A) for only $0.15 more after 15% off coupon
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
Would not recommend. 15W shared w/ 7.5W max per port if equal draw. Only good for slow-charging overnight
Would not recommend. 15W shared w/ 7.5W max per port if equal draw. Only good for slow-charging overnight
Or when traveling you can power 2 devices at the same time for slower charging. But then I'd say get a larger faster multiple port charger for traveling. And use this for when you need a second port occasionally. But then again that's just me. For more money you can get better. But then again your spending more money. 🤷
Lol, it's almost like I'm looking for a conspiracy but honestly I trust Anker I was just more curious how they had a product lineup that I've never seen pop up before and quick research showed me this is definitely a cheap 25 watt double pack with cheap cables, I'm sure they're fine but not the premium Anker ones lol
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
man I really sperged out on that research lol
So you're saying these are cheaply built and not normal Anker quality? Will they blow up my phone?
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I see a 2 pack of 20W dual port (1 type C, 1 type A) for only $0.15 more after 15% off coupon
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
The problem with that "type c type A" pack is that if you charge 2 devices at once, it drops the wattage to 7.5w max each port.
Top Comments
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
man I really sperged out on that research lol
27 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
man I really sperged out on that research lol
Amazon listing shows the model as:
• Model Number "A2652".
• Product SKU: B0CJ913JMX
Anker hasn't released any "boring" chargers like this in a very long time. They've been marketing to Apple users who need chargers cause they're still using their iPhone 6 5w charger like it's 2014. But Anker seemed to push the Nano lineup as it's small and GAN and 20w was fine for how tiny those are.
Anyone have any further speculation on if these are built by Samsung or someone that Anker is branding these with their name?
I trust it just curious as I've usually preferred and followed Anker for 9 years since getting USBC devices.
I googled both numbers, the SKU is definitely showing this is new/not a real product line release lol.
The model number also shares the same as Apple's official USBC Apple Watch charging cable
EDIT: the plot thickens... The "Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W) with USB-C to USB-C Cable" from 2021 is apparently PPS capable and sells for $9.99 on Amazon still, so I'm just morbidly curious about this specific model lol.
The Anker website shows the cable 543 model is 20,000+ bends so the one with this deal is definitely cheap at 5,000 only. :
"What You Get: Anker 312 Charger (Ace, 25W), Anker 543 USB-C to USB-C Cable (Bio-Based), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service."
This is the comparable model from Anker. The Nano is a bit more pricey so I can see why this is offered just wondering what the difference is in this and the 312 series model (unless that one DOESN'T offer PPS but Samsung S22 full 25w I think requires it)
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The other post only has 20W dual port. So one extra port but 5 less Watts. I didnt see PPS so if that's a deal breaker I'd say skip the dual port unit.
I ordered these below on Amazon and they have been spectacular, for iPhone and Pixel:
imuto 30W USB C Charger,2 Pack USB C Super Fast Charging Pixel Phone Charger GaN PD PPS
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
For 16 bucks people need this before they buy cheap no quality crap that runs way too high a risk of faulty hardware and overheats one day lol.
man I really sperged out on that research lol
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Anker iPhone 15 Charger, Anker USB C Charger Block, 2-Pack 20W Fast Wall Charger for 15/15 Pro/Pro Max/iPad Pro and More, with 2 Pack 5 ft USB-C Cable https://a.co/d/5LBKGed
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/aplus-media/sc/736aa562-1a3f-422c-80dc-f8f2e6330341.__CR0,0,1464... [media-amazon.com]