frontpage Posted by Navy-Wife | Staff ā¢ 3d ago
Mar 31, 2025 5:22 AM
Item 1 of 6
Item 1 of 6
frontpage Posted by Navy-Wife | Staff ā¢ 3d ago
Mar 31, 2025 5:22 AM
OtterBox USB-C Wall Charger: 30W Premium Pro $12, 20W Fast Charge (Bulk. Pkg)
& More + Free S/H w/ Amazon Prime$6.00
$25
76% offWoot!
Get Deal at Woot!Good Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Top Comments
Haven't bought an Anker charger in 5+ years, and doubt I ever will again. I stick to Apple chargers, and the occasional Belkin charger (as long as it's UL Listed).
Your question was about quality, and I answered with "UL Listing" blah blah. I should have answered more directly. I think it's safe to say that meeting UL (and other equivalent agency) ratings requires a quality design. Things like overload protection, proper high/low voltage separation (literal physical separation and gaps on circuit boards), quality components that won't catch fire, and overall good design take more time and $$. At least for me, UL Listing is the minimum I need to see on an AC Adapter, USB-C charger, appliances, and even some tools (usually corded+battery capable tools).
54 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
uh.. why?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank LivelyWalrus2520
I have ordered about 20 things from woot. 100% success rate for me!
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank bargainleecher
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Otterbox is a ... uh... "fairly" well-known company.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank wpgoalie03
Mind if I ask what the item purchased was that turned out to be fraud?
I've had two issues with products and both times when I reported it to Woot they just refunded me and said keep or dispose of the item, so they get high marks from me.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
First, you'll need to convince others that your "failure rate" is not from ever purchasing a single Woot! product.
I find your responses to have a 100% failure rate, according to my sample sizeā¦