Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by LovelyIdea542 • Yesterday
frontpage Posted by LovelyIdea542 • Yesterday

Refurbished: Nikon Z8 Mirrorless Camera w/ NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S Lens

+ Free Shipping

$3,600

$4,400

18% off
Nikon
25 Comments 3,392 Views
Get Deal at Nikon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Nikon has Nikon Z8 Mirrorless Camera w/ NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S Lens (Refurbished) for $3599.95. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member LovelyIdea542 for finding this deal.

Features:
  • 45.7MP FX-Format Stacked CMOS Sensor
  • Lightweight Design, 30% Smaller than Z9
  • 8.3K 60p N-RAW, 4.1K 60p ProRes RAW
  • 8K30p and 4K120p Video, 10-Bit Internal
  • Up to 20 fps Raw, 30 fps JPEG Shooting
  • 493-Point AF, AI-Based Subject Detection
  • Blackout-Free Real Live Viewfinder
  • 3.2" 4-Axis Tilting Touchscreen LCD
  • CFx Type B & SD Memory Card Slots
  • NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S Lens

Editor's Notes

Written by slickdewmaster | Staff

Original Post

Written by LovelyIdea542
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Nikon has Nikon Z8 Mirrorless Camera w/ NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S Lens (Refurbished) for $3599.95. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member LovelyIdea542 for finding this deal.

Features:
  • 45.7MP FX-Format Stacked CMOS Sensor
  • Lightweight Design, 30% Smaller than Z9
  • 8.3K 60p N-RAW, 4.1K 60p ProRes RAW
  • 8K30p and 4K120p Video, 10-Bit Internal
  • Up to 20 fps Raw, 30 fps JPEG Shooting
  • 493-Point AF, AI-Based Subject Detection
  • Blackout-Free Real Live Viewfinder
  • 3.2" 4-Axis Tilting Touchscreen LCD
  • CFx Type B & SD Memory Card Slots
  • NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S Lens

Editor's Notes

Written by slickdewmaster | Staff

Original Post

Written by LovelyIdea542

Community Voting

Deal Score
+13
Good Deal
Get Deal at Nikon
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

24 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Yesterday
3,587 Posts
Joined Apr 2015
Yesterday
SeanD1497
Yesterday
3,587 Posts
Clicked out of pure curiosity and confusion. Might want to put the brand name or some clue about what type of product this is in the tile. Surely camera geeks know what you mean, but the other 99% of us can't decipher what a Z8 + 24-120 mm Kit is without more context. And you'll get some hits from people who are only searching for "Nikon" or "camera".
Yesterday
909 Posts
Joined Mar 2009
Yesterday
DocLego
Yesterday
909 Posts
Quote from SeanD1497 :
Clicked out of pure curiosity and confusion. Might want to put the brand name or some clue about what type of product this is in the tile. Surely camera geeks know what you mean, but the other 99% of us can't decipher what a Z8 + 24-120 mm Kit is without more context. And you'll get some hits from people who are only searching for "Nikon" or "camera".
To be fair, if you don't already know what this is, you probably aren't going to be spending close to four grand on it.

But yeah, probably still worth putting "Nikon" in the title.
Yesterday
36 Posts
Joined Dec 2023
Yesterday
HappyMint802
Yesterday
36 Posts
So for any new camera people curious on what all these terms and numbers mean:


The camera body is a Nikon Z8, it's a 45.7MegaPixel stacked CMOS full frame sensor mirrorless camera that can record at 8k/30fps max (or 6k/60 or 4k/120)

Full frame just means that the sensor size, that is what the light ultimately hits. Full frame is a sensor the size of one of those old style analog photo tapes. You remember those old ones that you would take pictures with and you get a little spool that had a negative of the photos in small little rectangles? The full frame is the size of those rectangles.

The next smaller ones is APS-C and even smaller than that are phone camera sensors. You can google how big those are.

Why is a larger sensor important? A sensor is essentially just a layer on some silicon substrate of photosites, which are electrical components that take in photons and convert it into electrical signals. A larger sensor means either you can have larger photo sites so each pixel is generated using more photons (so essentially more information about the world is used to make 1 pixel), or more photosites to cream in more pixels. So a 24megapixel full frame camera just has larger photosites compared to a 48megapixel full frame. The 48 megapixel is more expensive to manufacturer since you need more overall photosites but it still gets the same information about the world.

A phone camera can have 200megapixels but this is where the argument of physics limitations comes in. Even though it could have a lot of photosites, it's not capable of receiving as many photons since it physically is just not large enough to do so. There are some optical tricks you could do like use mirrors and larger lenses that focus the light but still limited. A lot of the end result is the phone "guesstimating" what the pixel should be based on surrounding real pixels it makes.

A stacked CMOS sensor just means it has a few layers between the photosites and analog components that process the light input. What I mean is that instead of having a sensor that just intakes light and computation occurs somewhere else in the camera, it can all occur on the same sensor just need to physically separate it. This means it's a lot faster to process images just because less distance the data needs to transfer.

The cons is that it's a little more expensive to manufacturer.

The rest of the physical camera is usually controlled by the chip powering it, so this one can record at 8K which is definitely nothing to scoff at. Since maybe 10 years ago you'd need 20k camera to record 8k.


The lens says 24-120 f/4, what does this mean?

The lens is actually a very difficult to manufacturer properly part, and most people don't realize how difficult optics can be. For example the only company in the world capable of producing the mirrors used in ASMLs EUV machines is the German company ZEISS. It's literally the only one possible because it's so hard to manufacture this specific mirror.

So the 24-120 refers to 24-120mm which means that the lens is a zoom lens, you can have the distance the front of the lens is from the camera body, called the focal length, be 24mm away or extend it out to 120mm. The further away you have it, the more "zoom" you have at the cost of the fact that you are reducing your field of view.

For example when you zoom in your phone camera, you get closer to the subject but the rest of the photo is gone, like your camera is no longer looking at nearby plants or whatever. Same concept, you are getting closer to the subject but the total field you look at is reduced.

The way you can measure the optical zoom is simply divide the furthest it can go out by the smallest, so in this case 120/24 is 5x optical zoom. Optical zoom is better because we currently do not have technology that is capable of simulating the world as well as the world can simulate itself. So when you zoom in 5x, you are looking at the world 5x closer. When you use your phone camera to digitally zoom in you are essentially having the software take 1 pixel and make it 5x bigger which is why the images look blocky sometimes.

The f/4 is the aperature size, or essentially how large is the opening to the lens. It is shown as the focal length divided by some number, which in this case is 4. Normally for a zoom lens there is some changing number so it would be something like 4-6 saying that at 24mm the aperature is 24/4 or 6mm, and at 120 it expands to be 120/6 or 20mm.

A larger opening means it allows more light to come in. However a larger aperature is more expensive and heavier, it's better in low light situations and can produce a better focus on the subject.

It's kind of a give and take, there is no "best" although if someone were to give it to you for free obviously an f/1 would be the ideal lens since it has the largest opening but like I said it's gonna be heavy usually and expensive since it needs a larger front glass.

Other than that lenses can be a little complicated internally, modern ones usually has baked in auto focusing, they have USB c ports and require FIRMWARE UPDATES (which is crazy actually but cool), the have in lens stabilization so it handles a little hand jittering, weather sealing etc.

Ultimately smart phones destroyed the low end market which is why most cheap cameras are gone. The more expensive cameras do produce way better photos for sure. If you're new I wouldn't recommend blowing 4k on this, just because if you don't really care for the best image possible but just "good enough" then a phone camera is fine.

Honestly a modern iPhone or Samsung or whatever images are solid, I just think that right now they're still a ways away from being as good - but never say never of course
1
5
Yesterday
590 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
Yesterday
2J3Pop7
Yesterday
590 Posts
Can you share the mega thread? I can't find it. TY.
Yesterday
2,462 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
Yesterday
LavenderPickle7682
Yesterday
2,462 Posts
Quote from DocLego :
To be fair, if you don't already know what this is, you probably aren't going to be spending close to four grand on it. But yeah, probably still worth putting "Nikon" in the title.
It's not about "not knowing what this is", it's more about keyword searching and automated alerts (based upon keywords in the title).
Yesterday
43 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
Yesterday
kang4600
Yesterday
43 Posts
And z63 less than $1900.
Pro
Yesterday
7,120 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Yesterday
AkujunkanX
Pro
Yesterday
7,120 Posts
Z50 for $399 is Slick as well. With all the premium Z glass being made by 3rd Parties these days, the Z50 for so cheap would be the intro camera I'd recommend for people getting into photography.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Yesterday
145 Posts
Joined Jun 2022
Yesterday
Seed-Slay-Slick
Pro
Yesterday
145 Posts
Quote from AkujunkanX :
Z50 for $399 is Slick as well. With all the premium Z glass being made by 3rd Parties these days, the Z50 for so cheap would be the intro camera I'd recommend for people getting into photography.
I would suggest Z5 minimum with still great(iso100-400) D750 sensor and first gen ibis. About $100-200 more on used market. Z50 is very bad value compared to r50. RP is very bad value compared to Z5.
Pro
Yesterday
7,120 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Yesterday
AkujunkanX
Pro
Yesterday
7,120 Posts
Quote from Seed-Slay-Slick :
I would suggest Z5 minimum with still great(iso100-400) D750 sensor and first gen ibis. About $100-200 more on used market. Z50 is very bad value compared to r50. RP is very bad value compared to Z5.

Then stick to FF as a recommendation and see how that works out for the new folks...

Spoiler alert: they will eventually sell on the used market when they leave the hobby because their skill set doesn't match how much glass on FF costs.

I own a Z30, Z50. Z5, Z6, Z7... You don't need to quote me to drop your advice. You can do that on your own.
Pro
Yesterday
145 Posts
Joined Jun 2022
Yesterday
Seed-Slay-Slick
Pro
Yesterday
145 Posts
Quote from AkujunkanX :
Then stick to FF as a recommendation and see how that works out for the new folks...Spoiler alert: they will eventually sell on the used market when they leave the hobby because their skill set doesn't match how much glass on FF costs.I own a Z30, Z50. Z5, Z6, Z7... You don't need to quote me to drop your advice. You can do that on your own.
I bought a lot of lenses recently and tracked a lot of prices. I would say CF lenses are not great value now. Samyang 24-70 f/2.8(tamron 28-75,too) is $500-600 open box to new. Sigma 18-50mm is about $50 less. 35mm f1.8 samyang is $200-220, 23mm f1.4 of many brands can hardly go $20 less.
Yesterday
284 Posts
Joined May 2016
Yesterday
RCouchh
Yesterday
284 Posts
Buying Nikon in 2025 is wild
1
3
13h ago
7,826 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
13h ago
VarmintCong
13h ago
7,826 Posts
Quote from kang4600 :
And z63 less than $1900.
Lot of competition from the new Z5II. I'd jump on the Z6III if I didn't have a refurb Z8 already.
13h ago
7,826 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
13h ago
VarmintCong
13h ago
7,826 Posts
Quote from RCouchh :
Buying Nikon in 2025 is wild
Nikon is on a roll, just took the #1 position in Japan in mirrorless. Their lineup is awesome but very expensive.
Pro
13h ago
145 Posts
Joined Jun 2022
13h ago
Seed-Slay-Slick
Pro
13h ago
145 Posts
Quote from VarmintCong :
Nikon is on a roll, just took the #1 position in Japan in mirrorless. Their lineup is awesome but very expensive.
Not true.https://www.bcnretail.com/researc...s_type=101
1.r10 kit
2.r50 double kit B
3.zve10ii double kit B
4.r50 double kit W
5.z50ii double kit
And you just saw nikon z50ii at $650ish refurbished , $250 less than new. This tells how bad value it compares to other options.
You could say z5ii is the best selling FF mirrorless. But april was the release month.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

12h ago
7,826 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
12h ago
VarmintCong
12h ago
7,826 Posts
Quote from Seed-Slay-Slick :
Not true.https://www.bcnretail.com/researc...s_type=101
1.r10 kit
2.r50 double kit B
3.zve10ii double kit B
4.r50 double kit W
5.z50ii double kit
And you just saw nikon z50ii at $650ish refurbished , $250 less than new. This tells how bad value it compares to other options.
You could say z5ii is the best selling FF mirrorless. But april was the release month.
I said Nikon overall, not the Z5ii.

https://nikonrumors.com/2025/05/2...mera.aspx/

30% off for a refurb body is common, says nothing of the Z50ii's value. I got my Z8 refurb for $2400. That's 40% off.
Last edited by VarmintCong May 20, 2025 at 06:43 PM.

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All